Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]


@OutlineZB
  • Twitter feed loading
[hide]
  • Pages:
  • 1
Obamacare upheld in Supreme Court
Topic Started: Thursday, 28. June 2012, 11:49 (394 Views)
Stacha
Member Avatar
When you wear my flower, you make it beautiful.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/06/28/politics/supreme-court-health-ruling/index.html

What are your thoughts on this?

I have to admit, I don't know as much about Obamacare as I should, and will be reading up on it before I make a decision.
In this world you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
Posted Image
Add Me. | Ask Me.
Arahna Excerpt - Critique is super appreciated. :]
My life.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

I'm not really familiar with it all, it's a huge bill with so many parts, but I think the court made the right decision based on what I've heard and the laws in place.

The biggest issue has been can the government require (and penalize those that don't) people to have medical insurance? Basically, with the congressional power to tax, they do have the power.

But when Obama was pushing for the bill to become a law in the beginning, he said it wasn't a tax. And now it's being used as a tax to keep it standing. More two-facedism in politics, not surprising, but still interesting to think about.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Stacha
Member Avatar
When you wear my flower, you make it beautiful.

I mean, I expected a tax. The government can't afford to just provide healthcare for everyone, it needs to come out of taxes. But on the surface, I know I'd rather pay a little extra in taxes and know that if I get sick, I'll be taken care of, rather than have medical expenses weighing on my mind on top of everything else.
In this world you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
Posted Image
Add Me. | Ask Me.
Arahna Excerpt - Critique is super appreciated. :]
My life.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

No, they're calling the penalty for not getting this health coverage a "tax". At least, that's how I understand it and that's what the news has been inferring.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Stacha
Member Avatar
When you wear my flower, you make it beautiful.

I was just reading the wiki page on it but have yet to come to that part.

In this world you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
Posted Image
Add Me. | Ask Me.
Arahna Excerpt - Critique is super appreciated. :]
My life.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Ferus Grim
Member Avatar
"Ego sum aeternam"

Yes. Because we're not in enough debt, already. Let's give EVERYONE health insurance.

There's something called 'MediCare', that's government funded, but has requirements to get on it. Those requirements are there for a reason. We didn't need 'ObamaCare' to just take those requirements away (which is a horrid mistake, in and of itself).
Posted Image

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

Nicholas
Friday, 29. June 2012, 00:48
Yes. Because we're not in enough debt, already. Let's give EVERYONE health insurance.

There's something called 'MediCare', that's government funded, but has requirements to get on it. Those requirements are there for a reason. We didn't need 'ObamaCare' to just take those requirements away (which is a horrid mistake, in and of itself).
Medicare is only for 65 years and up, more people besides that age bracket need health coverage. The people on Medicare aren't the problem, because as you said, they've had coverage for years. It's everyone else from the time you leave your parents insurance as a young adult (now raised to age 26), up through age 64 that is the problem and I really hope this does help the situation.

Romney is already saying he's going to get it repealed. So if you don't like it, vote for him. XD

Just remember that he has a history of being two-faced.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Bluezone777
Member Avatar


Geoffrey
Friday, 29. June 2012, 09:02
Nicholas
Friday, 29. June 2012, 00:48
Yes. Because we're not in enough debt, already. Let's give EVERYONE health insurance.

There's something called 'MediCare', that's government funded, but has requirements to get on it. Those requirements are there for a reason. We didn't need 'ObamaCare' to just take those requirements away (which is a horrid mistake, in and of itself).
Medicare is only for 65 years and up, more people besides that age bracket need health coverage. The people on Medicare aren't the problem, because as you said, they've had coverage for years. It's everyone else from the time you leave your parents insurance as a young adult (now raised to age 26), up through age 64 that is the problem and I really hope this does help the situation.

Romney is already saying he's going to get it repealed. So if you don't like it, vote for him. XD

Just remember that he has a history of being two-faced.
It is also for those who have been listed as disabled regardless of age by a doctor. Just pointing out a small error but you still have a point though. Right now, most go to emergency rooms regardless of whether it's an emergency due to not needing to have to pay for it. This will let people be able to pay for doctor visits and leave the emergency room for actual emergencies like it should be.
Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

Bluezone777
Friday, 29. June 2012, 09:11
Geoffrey
Friday, 29. June 2012, 09:02
Nicholas
Friday, 29. June 2012, 00:48
Yes. Because we're not in enough debt, already. Let's give EVERYONE health insurance.

There's something called 'MediCare', that's government funded, but has requirements to get on it. Those requirements are there for a reason. We didn't need 'ObamaCare' to just take those requirements away (which is a horrid mistake, in and of itself).
Medicare is only for 65 years and up, more people besides that age bracket need health coverage. The people on Medicare aren't the problem, because as you said, they've had coverage for years. It's everyone else from the time you leave your parents insurance as a young adult (now raised to age 26), up through age 64 that is the problem and I really hope this does help the situation.

Romney is already saying he's going to get it repealed. So if you don't like it, vote for him. XD

Just remember that he has a history of being two-faced.
It is also for those who have been listed as disabled regardless of age by a doctor. Just pointing out a small error but you still have a point though. Right now, most go to emergency rooms regardless of whether it's an emergency due to not needing to have to pay for it. This will let people be able to pay for doctor visits and leave the emergency room for actual emergencies like it should be.
Well, in Indiana, disabled people go on Medicaid (a state ran insurance, Medicare is federal), so I was only speaking based on what my state does as that's the only one I'm familiar with.

Regardless, there are lot of people who are between ages 26 and 64 that aren't disabled that need insurance and with people losing their jobs a lot more now, they're also losing insurance.

I'm sure there are some down sides to this, but honestly, I've yet to hear them. Republicans are against it, but they've yet to say why they're against it other than a partisan support reason which isn't a reason. lol.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Bluezone777
Member Avatar


I am pretty sure the only reason they are against it is because the law was put through by a Democrat. It seems the Republicans just can't stand the thought of a democrat doing anything regardless of whether they actually feel it's a good idea or not. It's honestly grown annoying and is hampering this country from doing what it needs to do for its people.
Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

Bluezone777
Friday, 29. June 2012, 09:47
I am pretty sure the only reason they are against it is because the law was put through by a Democrat. It seems the Republicans just can't stand the thought of a democrat doing anything regardless of whether they actually feel it's a good idea or not. It's honestly grown annoying and is hampering this country from doing what it needs to do for its people.
Yep, partisan support. I can guarantee if Romney is elected and does manage to get rid of Obamacare, he'll have his own Romneycare and the Democrats will hate it even if it only changed minor things that really don't matter. It's sad, tbh. As Obama said in his address yesterday after the court decision, this isn't about the election, or partisanship, it's about the people and giving the people something they desperately need.

That man is a great speaker if he's anything at all.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Stacha
Member Avatar
When you wear my flower, you make it beautiful.

Geoffrey
Friday, 29. June 2012, 09:02
Nicholas
Friday, 29. June 2012, 00:48
Yes. Because we're not in enough debt, already. Let's give EVERYONE health insurance.

There's something called 'MediCare', that's government funded, but has requirements to get on it. Those requirements are there for a reason. We didn't need 'ObamaCare' to just take those requirements away (which is a horrid mistake, in and of itself).
Medicare is only for 65 years and up, more people besides that age bracket need health coverage. The people on Medicare aren't the problem, because as you said, they've had coverage for years. It's everyone else from the time you leave your parents insurance as a young adult (now raised to age 26), up through age 64 that is the problem and I really hope this does help the situation.

Romney is already saying he's going to get it repealed. So if you don't like it, vote for him. XD

Just remember that he has a history of being two-faced.
Ironically, Romney's health care proposal and Obama's proposal are virtually the exact same bill. Like you guys said, the main issue that most people seem to have is that it was Obama, a democrat, who proposed the Bill and got it passed. As a whole I've only seen Obama supporters in favor of the bill and Romney supporters against. Of the mountain of posts on my news feed a single Democrat has disagreed with the bill and a single Republican agree with it. If Romney were elected and Romneycare passed, I would wager almost anything that Republicans would blindly agree with it and Democrats blindly disagree. It's all to do with party prejudices. The overwhelming majority of people don't care what is passed, they only care who passed it.

Of course that doesn't apply to everyone, but it's my observation. I'm guilty of it too; immediately I'm inclinded to support Obamacare because I support Obama and the idea of universal health care. On the surface, all seems well to me. But I won't say I actually support or don't support it until I understand exactly what it means for this country.
In this world you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
Posted Image
Add Me. | Ask Me.
Arahna Excerpt - Critique is super appreciated. :]
My life.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
M.o.D
Member Avatar
1,000 Club
Comprehensive List of Tax Hikes in Obamacare
http://www.atr.org/comprehensive-list-tax-hikes-obamacare-a5758

soon we'll be paying with our blood
M.o.D's official topic for written raps: http://outlineforum.com/topic/4034275/1/#new
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Ferus Grim
Member Avatar
"Ego sum aeternam"

I meant Medicaid. ;D
Posted Image

Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
James Lu
Member Avatar
100 Club
Honestly nationalised health care is a good thing, it's worked in the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada... people using arguments like, "Why should I pay for Joe Schmuck's healthcare?" fail to realise that when they're in a dire situation Joe Schmuck is actually contributing to the fund that will save their life. It's not going to create debt and will mean people can actually see a doctor without needing actual money on hand.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
NuclearWarlord
Default Avatar
100 Club
Over three-fourths of doctors surveyed said that they will deny all patients with government healthcare and if this is not possible then they will shut down their practices.

This law is essentially a loss for us all. It's going to bankrupt insurance companies. And James Lu, the only reason that it works in foreign nations is because you have the English Rule, which prevents you from doing stuff like suing your doctor for giving you the lifesaving surgery, because you had some sort of disbenefit or pain from its aftereffects.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Stacha
Member Avatar
When you wear my flower, you make it beautiful.

NuclearWarlord
Saturday, 30. June 2012, 17:03
Over three-fourths of doctors surveyed said that they will deny all patients with government healthcare and if this is not possible then they will shut down their practices.
Then those are pretty terrible people. A doctor is supposed to treat the sick; refusing to treat patients because they have government health care shows a severe lack of ethics, and they should be ashamed of themselves. Period. It doesn't matter if it's government health care or not; if you're a doctor, you have a moral obligation to treat the sick and injured. Bottom line.
In this world you can be oh so smart or oh so pleasant. Well for years I was smart. I recommend pleasant.
Posted Image
Add Me. | Ask Me.
Arahna Excerpt - Critique is super appreciated. :]
My life.
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Geoffrey
Member Avatar
I'm in St. Louis!

Let them shut down their practices, they're the ones losing money. They have to work, and after spending so much time and money getting a medical license, why would they give it up over political reasons? They're being selfish and irrational, and I highly doubt that the majority of doctors would do that.
I will be away from Friday, May 24, through Sunday, May 26 (with no internet access).
I will also be away from Thursday, May 30, through Tuesday June 4 (though with some internet access).

geoffrey.outlineforum.com

Posted Image

Other Sigs
Awards & Memories
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
Bluezone777
Member Avatar


People will talk a lot of shit when they don't think they will have to put their money where their mouth is. I imagine many of the people who voted that won't go through with it because they are just throwing around empty threats. They took an oath to do no harm and by denying someone medical care is doing harm whether you like it or not.

No one should have their financial life completely ruined due to illness. The fact that it happens is a clear sign that we pay way too much for our healthcare.
Posted Image Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
James Lu
Member Avatar
100 Club
@NuclearWarlord: What on earth are you talking about? Patients are allowed to sue their doctors for any form of mistreatment, malpractice or extreme discomfort, particularly during complex operations. If the anaesthesiologist forgot to administer anaesthetic to me in a 3 hour surgery, I have every right to take legal action. So let's just clear that fallacious argument.

These doctors fail to realise that the money in the healthcare fund IS their payment and honestly what sort of excuses for humans are these miserable fish-guts if they so seek to deny a basic right? That's absolutely disgusting.
Posted Image
Posted ImagePosted Image
Offline Profile Quote Top
 
1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · General Chat · Next Topic »
  • Pages:
  • 1


support outline's resources
donate via paypal!