Aidan

Thursday, 26. July 2012, 17:44

JavaScript is much handier than jQuery, though jQuery is a lot easier because it's sort of like common sense. I wouldn't mind using this, when I'm not busy, to learn to use both JavaScript and jQuery hand-in-hand. Thanks for pointing this site out, Lewis.

Geoffrey

Thursday, 26. July 2012, 20:22

Just finished the first course. Understood everything but substrings, gonna need to go back over that when I'm not quite so tired. That counting is effed up. xD

FallenShadow

Friday, 27. July 2012, 05:53

Personally it's more for web design and freelance work, plus I can use it on IP.B and work my way into PHP so I can mod IP.B how I want

Flavius

Friday, 27. July 2012, 09:07

I've known about this for at least a couple of months. I originally found it on Forrst ages ago. It's a pretty good place to check out and learn stuff. It's not always the best for learning things but definitely a great place for practicing things you know.

Viral

Friday, 3. August 2012, 13:17

Spoiler: click to toggle

Code:

 

var lost = [4, 8, 15, 16, 23, 42];
var count = lost.length;

var isLost = function (n) {
for (i=0;i<count;i++) {
if ( n === lost[i]) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
};

if ( isLost(12) ) {
console.log('12 is a lost number');
}

if ( isLost(16) ) {
console.log('16 is a lost number');
}

That's what I would have done, so no different to yours except using explicit true and false over 1 and 0.